state of nature

You are currently browsing articles tagged state of nature.

“I had a dismal Prospect of my Condition, for as I was not cast away upon that Island without being driven, as is said, by a violent Storm quite out of the Course of our intended Voyage, and a great Way, viz. some Hundreds of Leagues out of the ordinary Course of the Trade of Mankind, I had great Reason to consider it as a Determination of Heaven, that in this desolate Place, and in this desolate Manner I should end my Life; the Tears would run plentifully down my Face when I made these Reflections, and sometimes I would expostulate with my self, Why Providence should thus compleatly ruine its Creatures, and render them so absolutely miserable, so without Help abandon’d, so entirely depress’d, that it could hardly be rational to be thankful for such a Life.”
D. Defoe, The Life and Adventures of Robinson Crusoe, VI (1719)

Robinson Crusoe described the fable of a civilized man left in a desert island, far from all commodities and tools, -away from civilization-, having to develop, in his solitude, primitive modes of subsistence and technologies to assure his survival. Daniel Defoe’s book did not only propose a self-centred individual and the fundamental traits of the homo oeconomicus, -an accounting of utilities and preferences according to a scale of profitability. He incarnated the real story of a Scottish sailor, named Alexander Selkirk, who decided toleave the company with whom he was travelling and was abandoned on an island in the coast of nowadays Chile.

His adventures served as a mental experiment on the possibilities of a man procuring his subsistence with the sole fruit of nature and his labour, without any mediation, in the absence of social institutions. An individual left to his own devices on an island, isolated. Solitude became a central aspect of Rousseau’s life and work, amplifying the classical individual, providing with the possibility of criticizing the world of appearances, of stepping back from the societal ties to obtain a wider picture of human nature.

Crusoe’s example had to serve the purpose of educating an adolescent. It was the book that Émile had to be acquainted with in order to develop his capacities, it showed him all the abilities required to subsist on his own. “Le plus sûr moyen de s’élever au-dessus des préjugés et d’ordonner ses jugements sur les vrais rapports des choses, est de se mettre à la place d’un homme isolé, et de juger de tout comme cet homme en doit juger lui-même, eu égard de sa propre utilité.”(1) Utility had to be taught as the measure of one’s actions, it provided with an appropriate guide to one’s endeavours.

Robinson’s island took the legacy of utopian thought to which Rousseau somehow adhered. Unfortunately, the outcome of his constitutional project for the Corsicans had a similar result to Plato’s renovation plans for Syracuse. Jean-Jacques’ utopian project did not adhere yo a non-existing tópos but was related to a hypothetical time, to a golden age when men were naturally good. This conjectural recession in time implied not only a phylogenesis of society but also an ontogenesis of the individual. Not only did primitive virtues excel modern morals, also the development of man made explicit the close link with his immanent origin: nature. Once more no transcendental or external time was proposed, like in Christian accounts, but a mere recoil into a hypothesised past, into pre-civilization.

(1) Émile III [Seuil III, p. 130].

Tags: , ,

Cornelis de Man 002

Society was not natural, no good in itself, it stood as a rational instrument, a medium to protect the basic good: life; opening a free space to a further deflection, an aberration, of those two concepts in the noetic space, -society and nature-, mediated by the individual. The possibility of death was the ultimate reason for the establishment of society. Death cleared to Christians the door to salvation, for Hobbes it was the ultimate evil of a nature composed of matter, and its effects, bodily pain and loss of power. The Gospel preached not to fear the one that could kill your body,(1) now there is no extremer penalty.

To attain a describing model of the causes of society a mental experiment was devised.(2) This was achieved by decomposing any occurrence in its most simple components and observing them without any attachment. Especially in the case of human affairs one had, according to his geometrical treatise on politics, De Cive, “to look at men, as if they were mushrooms…”

In the state of nature, which is both sequentially and conjecturally prior to the civil state, there is no resemblance of God’s presence. No golden age preceded the actual state of affairs. The past is terror, the present is order. The organized conception of Aquinas was replaced by a natural disorder and the need of an artificial device, a man-tailored artifactum, to prevent chaos. The constitution of the world became intrinsically feeble.

(1) Elements of Law I,14, 4.
(2) “Mathematical reasoning combined with well-chosen experiments may, it seems, do more than dispel the air of improbability initially surrounding a scientific proposition and establish it empirically…” J.W.N. Watkins, Hobbes’s System of Thought, London, 1973, p. 39.

Tags: , ,

Callot- Hanging Tree from The Myseries of War series 1629-33

Callot- Hanging Tree from The Myseries of War series 1629-33

This amalgamation of men, disjoint union of bodies, -fruit of Hobbes’s mental experiment-, eliminated all circumstances present in a stratum supporting a socialized human nature. Man is divested of the habits involved in the presumption of society, procuring with an experiment that abstracted the basic traits of this novel enclave of man within the noetic space and reproduced, in the vein of Galileo’s free fall exercise, an eventual state of nature. This natural condition entailed a state of disgrace in which the desiring nature of man caused a continuous struggle, nothing was certain, life was always in danger. The state of nature conveys the greatest menace to human integrity, it remained as a modality of war, the worst of all strives, -founded on the ius in omnia, the imperishable craving-, the ius belli omnes ad omnia. In this natural state nothing could be just, “force and fraud are the two cardinal virtues.”(1)

Individual actions were always prevented from success by insecurity. The state of nature did not provide with any sort of social organization beyond the random interactions between individual bodies, -tumult was its name. This fictive setting excluded the ideas already present at the time in Suarez and Grotius, supposing sociabilitas and stating the primitive character of democracy. This reformulation was only coherent within the extension of the institutions of the philosophia prima and the consequent subvertion, deposition, of values and discourses.

In the state of nature reigned the principle of scarcity plus the invincible desire of every man.(2) Competition arose as the first cause of quarrel among men together with diffidence and glory. In the interaction with people we strive for our own satisfaction, determined by our particular inclinations. Moral thinking was expurgated from the classical ideas of community and the necessity of fellow men; man was incepted alone.(3)

(1) Leviathan I, 13, 13.
(2) From this equality of ability, ariseth equality of hope in the attaining of our ends. And therefore if any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless they cannot both enjoy, they become enemies…” Leviathan I, 13, 3. Cf. De Cive, I, 6.
(3) “Furthermore, since the combate of Wits is the fiercest, the greates discords which are, must necessarily arise from this Contention…” De Cive I, 5. The other is a function of the self and has lost his autonomy in front of the self-sufficient subject. To Esfeld, there lies Hobbes’s mistake, in his opposition of individual consciencousness and otherness. “Hobbes geht davon aus, daß jeder Handelnde sich selbst als Individuum im Unterschied zu anderen Individuen versteht.” M. Esfeld, op. cit., p. 260 italics mine

Tags: , ,